Scott Ziegler’s indictments

MacKenzie Bunn, News, Campus, & Media Editor

Ziegler’s first charge was a Class 3 misdemeanor for false publication. On June 22, 2021 during a now infamous school board meeting, when asked by another board member, “do we have assaults in our bathrooms or in our locker rooms, regularly?” Ziegler replied, “to my knowledge we don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.”

Prior to the meeting, Ziegler had received emails regarding, and notified fellow board members of, the assault at Stone Bridge High School just months earlier. Ultimately, the statement was found to be knowingly “false and untrue” by the grand jury.

Ziegler’s second and third charges were for a less well known incident from the 2021-2022 school year: the case of Erin Brooks.

Likely overshadowed at the time by the assault at Stone Bridge, Erin Brooks, a teacher, repeatedly faced sexual advances and assaults by one of her students. Their behavior reportedly was experienced by Brooks’ colleagues and the perpetrator’s classmates as well.

Brooks’ principal and other faculty habitually dismissed her claims and offered irrelevant and intolerant “solutions” to the student’s behavior.

After being told by the principal that she, “didn’t believe it was sexual,” Brooks took matters into her own hands by filing with her superiors and filling out a Title IX Complaint Form—a measure which aimed to, “ensure that once any school or division employee has notice of sex discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual misconduct, the division takes immediate and appropriate steps to investigate what occurred and takes prompt and effective action to stop the discrimination or harassment, prevent the recurrence, and remedy the effects.”

These efforts led to little concrete effort by her school’s administration and the school board, though her plights were highlighted when she testified to the grand jury in April of 2022.

Ziegler, among other higher-ups in Brooks’ school, was involved in penalizing her for her appearance in court and using his position to threaten and effectively retaliate against Brooks for expressing concern over the student and their behavior.

Brooks’ employment contract was not renewed for the 2022-2023 school year, and nothing came of her Title IX complaint.

Thus, Ziegler’s second and third misdemeanor charges were for penalizing Brooks for her court appearance, a Class 3 misdemeanor, and for exhibiting a conflict of interest when it came to prohibiting her conduct, a Class 1 misdemeanor.